Dragon Twin Comforter

Happy and Saddam

Happy and Saddam

 

 `Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness` is enshrined in the USA`s Declaration of Independance, July 4, 1776. The opposite of happy is sad, and the USA was saddened, or `Saddamed` on 9/11. The terrorist attacks were performed by `Islamic martyrs` which, amongst terrorists, means kamikaze-like `suicide`; but the terrorist would like to be understood as sacrificing themselves on behalf of God, and this is anti-Islamic. In the New Testament, Jesus` Redemption is not the result of `self-sacrifice` but the rejection of sadism, that is, those who would `crucify`.

 

 Saddam is identifiable as the red dragon of Revelation, which waits to devour the child born to the woman `clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet` at the birth of he `who shall rule the nations with an iron scepter` (Rev: 12.1-18). He is `God`s law`, which Jesus distills in the New Testament as `God is love` (Matt: 22.39), and that`s `happiness` in terms of the American Dream. Saddam is he who, as the devourer of life, sought sadism and damnation for Iraq - the sad `damned` nation, as it were – and for the USA by encouraging it to become embroiled in sadism, which is what happened at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere.1

 

 Britney Spears (1982-) in Oops I Did It Again (2000) is prescient in her portrayal of a red suited dragon of Revelation that represents the myth of the Ourobouros serpent, which is that of self-begetting, self-devouring, regeneration and rebirth. The devouring aspect is the red dragon of Revelation, which is waiting to attack the USA on 9/11 2001. But Britney Spears represents the saving, that is, Redemption, of the Creator`s Producer (Woman) and Product – Civilization – which is why she is wrong, `red dressed`. After the Gulf War of 1990-1, and the `redressing of wrongs`, that is, reparations from the Iraqi government after Saddam`s removal from Kuwait, the United States had the Sword of Jesus, which means they refused to allow Kuwait to be a `sacrificial lamb` and had taken up the sword against the sadist who`d used poison gas against his own people in Kurdistan2 before raping and murdering in Kuwait.

 

 The crucifixion scene suggests Jesus is a `sacrificial lamb` but his crucifiers are sadists, so the Redemption is his and not theirs. After Jesus` Ascension (1 John: 2.1), the Paraclete is given by God to teach upon the Earth as the Holy Spirit in order to preach Redemption to later generations. What is taught is action against sadism, which is how Saddam is recognizable as the dragon of Revelation. Jesus is described as the `lamb of God` (Rev: 5.13), not because he is a `sacrificial lamb`, although he is crucified in a Pagan style, but because he was murdered by sadists – and triumphed over them. Being `washed in the blood of the lamb` (Rev: 12.11) is Redemption from acceptance of the teachings of Jesus through the tutelary spirit that is the Paraclete.

 

 Redemption cannot be obtained through war, but the USA`s taking up of the sword to defend Kuwait (1990-1) is Jesus` position. The Spear of Longinus cuts open the side of Jesus (Matt: 27.54) upon the cross and the Paraclete or Holy Spirit is, metaphorically, born; because Jesus is the Second Adam and Eve (Gen: 2.9) was taken from his side. Jesus` position is, therefore, that of defending the Woman, which is the USA`s unconscious role in the Gulf War (2001-3). Jesus has a crown of thorns at his crucifixion, and the legend is that the Robin3 pierces itself in endeavouring to remove the largest and sharpest from Jesus` head. It is a symbol of the defender.

 

 Britney Spears in Oops I Did It Again is Kuwait`s `red dressed` wrongs and she`s the Robin `red breast` of Christian tradition, that is, the USA has defended Jesus, and she`s `Miss American Dream` but not ` innocent`, which is what the Dream and Manifest Destiny is: innocent progress and development without threat. After Kuwait, she has dealt with the threat but is not innocent. Saddam Hussein (1937-2006) was the largest thorn in the crown of Jesus, and she`ll remove it. 9/11 came later, and terrorists are lesser thorns, so the USA shall continue to have Redemption and use the sword of Jesus to defend the `meek that shall inherit the Earth`, that is, those who have accepted God`s law, God`s love and Woman – perdition else.

 

 The difficulty woman has is believing in a God that seeks to devour her, which is what the red dragon of Revelation represents. She is the Creator`s Producer and Product – Civilization – and God is the Father to men who devour it and her. The child born to the `woman clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet` who `rules the nations with an iron scepter` suggest someone whose head isn`t turned by wealth and is strong in God`s law. The dragon waiting to devour him at his birth is male, and therefore capable of fathering; but he isn`t God. The imagery is the eternal dilemma faced by woman; if she produces a male child it will devour her unless she can prevent it from becoming a dragon.

 

 The child is the Creator`s Producer`s Product that represents Redemption and the Woman`s ability to defend Civilization because she inculcates the right values in her son. He is the New Redeemer in some interpretations but is more understandable as the New Redemption. Woman`s problem is, if God`s male, he wants to eat her. Jesus therefore engineers the Redemption by means of his strategy as a teacher who has accepted his role as the Second Adam who had Eve tempted from his side by the Evil One. As the Second Adam, he has Eve by his side as the Spirit of God, symbolized by the Paraclete`s emergence after his crucifixion and Ascension.

 

 Effectively, she emerges as God`s Spirit from Longinus` cutting open of Christ`s side with his spear – as Eve first emerged from the side of Adam - and is the engineer of the Second Redemption as the Woman of Revelation. If God is love and God`s Spirit is female, then God should be Woman, and the missing component is the penis. In order to be God, she`d have to be a fatherer, that is, the Woman of Revelation is futanar and has Woman as her father. The New Redemption is a species` development. Woman as futanar has a penis, and she doesn`t need men who won`t accept God`s love, that is, Woman and Redemption through her Holy Spirit. If men don`t want her, they don`t want God, and they`ll have perdition, which is eternal unendurable pain.

 

 Woman`s difficulty is defence, because she is trained to be the `teacher, guide, comforter and helpmeet` of man, which is the description of the Paraclete in the Bible. She emerges from Christ`s crucifixion, that is, for Woman acceptance of Jesus is acceptance of helplessness and self-sacrifice. In other words, she is trained to be a masochist that, empowered, will be a sadist. In Enough (2002), Jennifer Lopez (1969-), over two hours, trains to kill her husband, who is a sadist. She feels empowered because she accepts the framework. World heavyweight boxing champions do the same. If Jennifer killed her husband before the movie, there`d be no action. Without Saddam Hussein there`d have been no Gulf War and the Americans gave him the world`s third largest army to play with. Colin Powell (1937-) had to accept `rules of engagement`, which handicaps God who wants evil exterminated, not courted.

 

 

 

 Revelation is Jesus` `rules of engagement` and, in his Second Coming with the Sword he exterminates the evil - without handicap - and there is the `marriage of the lamb`, which is his `bride`. In other words, men`s `rules of engagement` are constructs designed to further sadistic ploys. Whether in marital terms, in which Woman`s penis isn`t admitted in order that she be handicapped - or militarily, so that the World heavyweight champions can slug it out until one of them wins; so causing the deaths of thousands whereas a `sucker punch` to KO Saddam wouldn`t be perceived as `playing the game`: although it would effectively terminate hostilities before they began. The `rules of engagement` are handicappings to ensure an even contest rather than the extermination of evil.

 

 Wars aren`t sports, and they aren`t `marriages`; but we use the terms `rules of engagement` as if it`s a military campaign. The second Gulf War should actually have been a divorcing of evil. Jesus, who comes with the Sword to exterminate the evil in Revelation, divorces it and his `marriage` with the `bride` in the consummation of human history. He is only bound by God`s law, which is God`s love and Redemption. The Sword is the instrument of predestined division of the good from the evil. God`s law, God`s love and Redemption are Jesus` `rules of engagement` before he marries. Men deliberately handicap God with their `rules of engagement`, maritally and militarily. They deny that Woman has a penis, it`s usage, and it`s potential as an excluder of men from Woman. If she has a penis, she doesn`t need men and, because she`s God`s love, she`s closer to God and what God means by mankind`s Redemption. Closer than men who have sought to exclude her from herself as the Creator`s Producer of a new heaven and Earth, which is God`s Promise fulfilled in Revelation.

 

 Military campaigns are similarly exclusive; they aren`t concerned with the defense of the Creator`s Producer and Product – Woman – but the perpetuation of war games – as gladiators in the Roman `circus` or boxers in the ring. The `circus` is the name given to intelligence gathering, so there`s an analogy between gladiators, boxers, and the `circus ring`, which is that intelligence isn`t sufficient because it`s handicapped for the same reason as horses in horse racing; to even the contest. Sadists want to perpetuate violence as a game and intelligence as a `circus ring` in which men are trained to perform as `beasts`, which is what Revelation warns of. The Romans watched sadistically as gladiators died. Boxing is a smiliar construct, and war is another. Jesus has Redemption, then, not because he`s tortured by the Romans in one of their sadistic `games`, but because he is a teacher who accepts God`s love` and, prepared, comes in Revelation with the Sword, to exterminate the sadists.

 

 Humans are fooled by sadistic constructs. Only God`s law is important, which is God`s love or the Sword of extinction for the evil. The constructs are irrelevant. Boxing is a sport, movies are art, war is not. The paradigm does not fit, and the paradigm is sado-masochism. Woman`s paradigm is similarly false. They`re trained to be dominated, whereas they`re the dominant species as the Producer and Product. What Woman has to learn is self-defence, which is easier if she knows that she can father with her own penis, because Woman nurtures and so Civilization`s product is valued by her - and men`s conditioning of her can be broken.

 

 9/11 represents 20th Century system`s conditioning in which `protocols` are more important than intelligence. This is the handicap. Essentially, America`s system was hacked and the civilian aircraft that were crashed into the Twin Towers by terrorists in 2001 were a virus. It is common for hackers to be invited by those they hack into to improve their defenses. But the paradigm is sodomy and the AIDS virus. The USA`s protocols were ineffective because they were inviting Saddamy. That was the 20th century paradigm: hack into the superpower`s defence system and be employed by it. But you can`t improve an immune system by giving it AIDS and 20th century computer systems` improvers were persuaded that you could build `hacker invite programmes` into their systems to catch and employ virus-developers. But it`s a sado-masochistic perspective promulgated by sadists who want to inflict irreparable damage and torment rather than work themselves a job opportunity.

 

 9/11 wasn`t exactly Sodom and Gomorrah but Saddam and Camera - a hit on the Twin Towers - by hacker invite – the late 20th Century paradigm: a gay BDSM film. It`s Saddam or it`s Adam - Adam eyes or Saddam eyes. Sadder My`s is `my eyes are sadder than your eyes`, which means that Saddam (analogous, spiritually, to the city of Sodom) represents an invitation to the USA to engage in sado-masochistic Saddamy, and the hypothetical statement `I be Saddam` may be interpreted as `I beast am`, that is, I am the beast of Revelation. God destroys Sodom (Gen: 18,19) and Saddam is it`s continuing spirit, as it were. As Saddam, he is the false Adam; the False Prophet of Revelation who wants to lead an Islamic Jihad against the USA. The True Prophet is Jesus, the Second Adam whose city isn`t that of Saddam but Adam`s city, the city of New York; the `Big Apple`.

 

 Jesus has Adam`s eyes, that is, his eyes are on God - and Woman. Jesus` eyes upon Earth are the eyes of Eve; effectively resurgent from his side as the Paraclete when the spear of Longinus cuts him open - as if by Caesarean section. Jesus` eyes are upon Woman, and he offers mankind Redemption through her physical and spiritual love, but she is his `bride` and Revelation celebrates his marriage after he exterminates the evil with his Sword and gives them perdition. The dragon is eyeing the child, preparing to devour it, that is, Saddam eyes: he eyes as the False Prophet. He is the beast, the red dragon of Revelation eyeing the Woman `clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet`. The child is the enforcer of God`s love; he `who rules the nations with an iron scepter` on behalf of Woman.

 

 In the Old Testament, the Spirit of God dwells in the place where the Commandments are kept in the Ark of the Covenant, and she is the Shekinah (Ex: 40.35), so the child of the Woman with the `iron scepter` is protecting her. According to Jesus, in the New Testament, God`s law is God`s love, so the child that protects the Shekinah is God`s law and she is God`s love, which is what the Paraclete teaches – Redemption through God`s love. The Paraclete is the Shekinah of the Old Testament and the Holy Spirit in the New Testament, and Jesus` eyes are hers and for hers, which is why he has `Adam eyes` and not `Saddam eyes`, that is, he isn`t sadism and sodomy, which are `beasts`, the False Prophet, and the red dragon of Revelation as the would-be devourer of Woman`s next Product; the new heaven and new Earth.

 

 Trained by men, Woman would expect God to be her father, but as a Woman with a penis she can father, so God is a Mother. Woman does not need men, and that is what Jesus` training is for. She has to defend her own paradigm, which is that she has attempted Redemption for man; but she doesn`t have to continue with this paradigm after Jesus` Second Coming with the Sword to free her after her child of Revelation has protected her. She has her own reproductive equipment and can be the Creator`s Producer and Product in the new heaven and Earth, without men who have tortured her species, kept her prisoner, filled her with lies, and told her she was impotent.

 

 Men invented sodomy, because they don`t have Woman`s equipment. Woman with a penis would be more likely to take care of her equipment, so 9/11 wouldn`t have happened if men had taken more care of her. `America the Beautiful` is the analagous paradigm because what is beautiful is good. New York is the `Big Apple` and the apple is good, so why wouldn`t I want it? Adam and Eve, in Eden, eat the apple from the `tree of the knowledge of good and evil` (Gen: 2.9), and the snake is the symbolic penis that tempts them to evil, but it isn`t Eve`s or Adam`s. It`s Saddam`s, and the beasts of Revelation, sadism and sodomy, that is, Saddamy.

 

 9/11`s hijacked civilian aircraft were the hacker`s virus as AIDS` paradigm. Saddam was descried as the Antichrist, and that`s correct because he`s anti-sex and, insofar as God is Woman`s love, Christianity is sex. As Saddam, he isn`t Adam, but an old place made new: Sodom and sadism - sterility. Sex is the `Big Apple` of New York – `Adam`s apple` – an idiom used to denote the epiglottis; a part of swallowing (pharynx) and speaking (larynx). On 9/11 the `talking was over`, according to the devourer waiting to devour the child of the `woman clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet`, who is Eve, and her child who`s to `rule the nations with an iron scepter`.

 

 It`s a metaphor; boys don`t become men: they are devourers, and he with the `scepter` is adhering to the enforcing of God`s law, which is God`s love, and Redemption in accordance with Jesus` `rules of engagement`. He accepts Jesus` teachings and defends the Creator`s Producer and Product – Woman and Civilization – against illiteracy, which is hating rather than loving, or devourment rather than kissing, reading or speaking. Saddam didn`t break the `rules of engagement`; the invasion of Kuwait and 9/11 were `sneak attacks` similar to the Japanese attack on the US Sixth Fleet at Hawaii`s Pearl Harbour in 1941. The USA had given him Earth`s 3rd largest army as a `wooing`, but he betrayed their Faith.

 

 In Christian terms, he was the `lamb that spake like a dragon`, which is the second beast of Revelation (Rev: 13.11-12), the False Prophet of Islamic Jihad against the USA, and indicates Saddam`s, that is, sadism and sodomy`s (a stab in the back is, effectively, `higher` anal penetration – 9/11`s civil aircraft were lying about their `orientation`) exclusion from the `marriage of the lamb`: the new heaven and Earth of Revelation created by God for Jesus` Woman. If men do not want Woman, or her product – Civilization – then it is as her tormentors that they seek to continue. If Woman wants to live, she should acknowledge that men want her to die.

 

 In Revelation, Jesus comes with the Sword of God, her Sword, to save her, from men. She is Woman, and she accepts him because she can believe in him. In effect, he is her as the sacrificed - and the rescuer. Jesus is God`s Woman with a Sword in her hand and God, thereafter, creates a new heaven, and Earth from which men will be excluded if they don`t accept that God is Woman`s love - and she is the Father because she has her own penis too. However, if she continues to perceive her role – and Jesus` - as self-sacrifice, she`ll accept her training from men, turn upon her sisters with them, and won`t escape from them but shall experience perdition. This is the danger that acceptance of sado-masochistic paradigms represent, that is, dominance means subjugation and the rejection of development, whereas God`s law is love and God is omnipotent.

 

1 http://jasonjeffrey.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/obama-creates-indefinite-detention-system-for-prisoners-at-guantanamo-bay/

 

2 Cole, Juan `Did Saddam Gas The Kurds?` 2-04-03 http://hnn.us/articles/1242.html

 

3 http://www.mamarocks.com/first_robin.htm

 

 4 Bates, Katherine Lee, Ward, Samuel A. The Congregationalist, July 4, 1895.

About the Author

Received a Ph.D in English in 1993 from the University of Kingston-Upon-Hull, England, for research thesis titled 'Jungian Archetypes in the work of [science fiction writer] Robert A. Heinlein'. Most recently published non-fiction in June 2008's Humanizing Language Teaching online journal with an article based on English language teaching experiences in Khartoum, Sudan, West Africa, titled 'Bitchin' English', in December 2009`s HLT with `Our Old Man In Oman`, April 2010`s `The Further Adventures of Dr Usher`, and June`s `Putting One`s Feet Up Without Permission`. First published article 'Robert A. Heinlein: Theologist?' in the British journal of science fiction Foundation (54). Pedagogic article 'Learning to Study' in the Hungarian Institute for Educational Research's journal Educatio (3) in 1995. Also a writer of science fiction; stories published include: 'Out of this World' (1994) and 'Ride!' she said' (1997) for the UK's Desire magazine. Stories published in Hungary; ‘Sas' in Oszirisz Országa [‘Special Angel Service' in Land of Osiris]. Cherubion Press, Debrecen, Hungary, 1996, pp.184-91, `Bevezetés a Valhallába' in Universzum Örokösei [‘Valhalla for Starters' in Inheritors of the Universe], Cherubion Press, 1996, pp. 143-7, ‘Fegyverforgatás Mestere' in Galaxisz A Gászara [`Master Arms Practitioner' in Emperor of the Galaxy], Cherubion Press, 1997, pp.281-6. Most recently; 'Well, it was like this doc...' at Ruthie's Club < http://www.ruthiesclub.com > March 2009, and 'All For Naught Orphan Ufonaut' in Shelter of Daylight, Sam's Dot Publishing, October 2010. Taught English language and literature in Hungary, Poland, Russia, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Oman.

ThinkGeek Kids Geeky Twin Bed Sheet Set $9.99 And because they dream of so many things we created the perfect set of sheets to send them off on their nighttime escapades. The ThinkGeek Kids Geeky Bed Sheets are based on original ThinkGeek illustrations that cover most of the geeky spectrum. If you haven't guessed, what's on the sheets appears in the poem above. Goodnight, sweet Geeklings. Dream of starships and valiant battles!...

Dragons and Knights Twin Size Quilt with 1 Matching Pillow Sham $49.99 ...

Pink Dragonfly Dreams Children's Bedding 4pc Twin Set $99.99 Dragonfly Dreams gorgeous 4pc. Twin Bedding Ensemble has all that your little one will need. Delicate Embroidered dragonflies flutter around this beautiful and exquisite set. Made with Light Pink, Cream, White and Dusty Yellow accents, this set is truly stunning. Oh SOOO Soft White Chenille borders the set to add that extra special touch.. It is made of 100% cotton and every piece in inspected for...

X Games Dragon Comforter Twin comforter 66"x 86" , 60% cotton 40% polyester fabric, 100% polyester fill...